Influence of Implant Length and Bicortical Anchorage on Implant Stress Distribution
Identifieur interne : 000284 ( France/Analysis ); précédent : 000283; suivant : 000285Influence of Implant Length and Bicortical Anchorage on Implant Stress Distribution
Auteurs : Laurent Pierrisnard [France] ; Franck Renouard [France] ; Patrick Renault [France] ; Michel Barquins [France]Source :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2003-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Anchorage, Apical, Bicortical, Bicortical anchorage, Bicortical implant, Biomechanical, Bone stress, Cancellous, Cancellous bone, Cervical, Cervical area, Clinical implant dentistry, Cortical bone, Dental implants, Finite element analysis, Gold screw, Histogram charting stress intensity, Implant, Implant components, Implant displacement, Implant length, Implant neck, Long implants, Maxillofac, Mechanical properties, Monocortical, Monocortical anchorage, Monocortical implant, Occlusal load, Oral maxillofac implants, Short implants, Stress distribution, Stress increase, Stress intensity, Titanium abutment screw, Various isostress ranges.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Anchorage, Apical, Bicortical, Bicortical anchorage, Bicortical implant, Biomechanical, Bone stress, Cancellous, Cancellous bone, Cervical, Cervical area, Clinical implant dentistry, Cortical bone, Dental implants, Finite element analysis, Gold screw, Histogram charting stress intensity, Implant, Implant components, Implant displacement, Implant length, Implant neck, Long implants, Maxillofac, Mechanical properties, Monocortical, Monocortical anchorage, Monocortical implant, Occlusal load, Oral maxillofac implants, Short implants, Stress distribution, Stress increase, Stress intensity, Titanium abutment screw, Various isostress ranges.
Abstract
Background: Short implants present superior failure rates for everybody. Purpose: The aim of this theoretic study was to assess to what extent implant length and bicortical anchorage affect the way stress is transferred to implant components, the implant proper, and the surrounding bone. Materials and Methods: Stress analysis was performed using finite element analysis. A three‐dimensional linear elastic model was generated. All implants modeled were of the same diameter (3.75 mm) but varied in length, at 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 mm (Branemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). Each implant was modeled with a titanium abutment screw and abutment, a gold cylinder and prosthetic screw, and a ceramic crown. The implants were seated in a supporting bone structure consisting of cortical and cancellous bone. An occlusal load of 100 N was applied at a 30° angle to the buccolingual plane. Results: With the selected model and bone properties, the coronal cortical anchorage was dominating, and the bone stress concentrated to that area. Conclusions: The maximum bone stress was virtually constant, independent of implant length and bicortical anchorage. The maximum implant stress, however, increased somewhat with implant length and bicortical anchorage.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00208.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 003975
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 003975
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 003567
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 008176
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 007F41
- to stream Main, to step Exploration: 007F41
- to stream France, to step Extraction: 000284
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:74A6AF563AC2406B598B1B6C558CBD183EEA6284Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influence of Implant Length and Bicortical Anchorage on Implant Stress Distribution</title>
<author><name sortKey="Pierrisnard, Laurent" sort="Pierrisnard, Laurent" uniqKey="Pierrisnard L" first="Laurent" last="Pierrisnard">Laurent Pierrisnard</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Renouard, Franck" sort="Renouard, Franck" uniqKey="Renouard F" first="Franck" last="Renouard">Franck Renouard</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Renault, Patrick" sort="Renault, Patrick" uniqKey="Renault P" first="Patrick" last="Renault">Patrick Renault</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Barquins, Michel" sort="Barquins, Michel" uniqKey="Barquins M" first="Michel" last="Barquins">Michel Barquins</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:74A6AF563AC2406B598B1B6C558CBD183EEA6284</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00208.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/74A6AF563AC2406B598B1B6C558CBD183EEA6284/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003975</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003975</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003975</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003567</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003567</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1523-0899:2003:Pierrisnard L:influence:of:implant</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008176</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">007F41</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">007F41</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/France/Extraction">000284</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Influence of Implant Length and Bicortical Anchorage on Implant Stress Distribution</title>
<author><name sortKey="Pierrisnard, Laurent" sort="Pierrisnard, Laurent" uniqKey="Pierrisnard L" first="Laurent" last="Pierrisnard">Laurent Pierrisnard</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Senior lecturer, Faculty of Dental Surgery Montrouge, University of Paris V, Department of Prosthetics, Paris</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="region">Île-de-France</region>
<region type="old region">Île-de-France</region>
<settlement type="city">Paris</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">France</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Renouard, Franck" sort="Renouard, Franck" uniqKey="Renouard F" first="Franck" last="Renouard">Franck Renouard</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Private practice, Paris</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="region">Île-de-France</region>
<region type="old region">Île-de-France</region>
<settlement type="city">Paris</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Renault, Patrick" sort="Renault, Patrick" uniqKey="Renault P" first="Patrick" last="Renault">Patrick Renault</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Senior lecturer, Faculty of Dental Surgery Montrouge, University of Paris V, Department of Prosthetics, Paris</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="region">Île-de-France</region>
<region type="old region">Île-de-France</region>
<settlement type="city">Paris</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Barquins, Michel" sort="Barquins, Michel" uniqKey="Barquins M" first="Michel" last="Barquins">Michel Barquins</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Research director, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ecole Superieure de Physique Chimie Industrielle (ESPCI), Paris</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="region">Île-de-France</region>
<region type="old region">Île-de-France</region>
<settlement type="city">Paris</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="254">254</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="262">262</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003-12">2003-12</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment screw</term>
<term>Anchorage</term>
<term>Apical</term>
<term>Bicortical</term>
<term>Bicortical anchorage</term>
<term>Bicortical implant</term>
<term>Biomechanical</term>
<term>Bone stress</term>
<term>Cancellous</term>
<term>Cancellous bone</term>
<term>Cervical</term>
<term>Cervical area</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Cortical bone</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Finite element analysis</term>
<term>Gold screw</term>
<term>Histogram charting stress intensity</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant components</term>
<term>Implant displacement</term>
<term>Implant length</term>
<term>Implant neck</term>
<term>Long implants</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Mechanical properties</term>
<term>Monocortical</term>
<term>Monocortical anchorage</term>
<term>Monocortical implant</term>
<term>Occlusal load</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Short implants</term>
<term>Stress distribution</term>
<term>Stress increase</term>
<term>Stress intensity</term>
<term>Titanium abutment screw</term>
<term>Various isostress ranges</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment screw</term>
<term>Anchorage</term>
<term>Apical</term>
<term>Bicortical</term>
<term>Bicortical anchorage</term>
<term>Bicortical implant</term>
<term>Biomechanical</term>
<term>Bone stress</term>
<term>Cancellous</term>
<term>Cancellous bone</term>
<term>Cervical</term>
<term>Cervical area</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Cortical bone</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Finite element analysis</term>
<term>Gold screw</term>
<term>Histogram charting stress intensity</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant components</term>
<term>Implant displacement</term>
<term>Implant length</term>
<term>Implant neck</term>
<term>Long implants</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Mechanical properties</term>
<term>Monocortical</term>
<term>Monocortical anchorage</term>
<term>Monocortical implant</term>
<term>Occlusal load</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Short implants</term>
<term>Stress distribution</term>
<term>Stress increase</term>
<term>Stress intensity</term>
<term>Titanium abutment screw</term>
<term>Various isostress ranges</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Short implants present superior failure rates for everybody. Purpose: The aim of this theoretic study was to assess to what extent implant length and bicortical anchorage affect the way stress is transferred to implant components, the implant proper, and the surrounding bone. Materials and Methods: Stress analysis was performed using finite element analysis. A three‐dimensional linear elastic model was generated. All implants modeled were of the same diameter (3.75 mm) but varied in length, at 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 mm (Branemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). Each implant was modeled with a titanium abutment screw and abutment, a gold cylinder and prosthetic screw, and a ceramic crown. The implants were seated in a supporting bone structure consisting of cortical and cancellous bone. An occlusal load of 100 N was applied at a 30° angle to the buccolingual plane. Results: With the selected model and bone properties, the coronal cortical anchorage was dominating, and the bone stress concentrated to that area. Conclusions: The maximum bone stress was virtually constant, independent of implant length and bicortical anchorage. The maximum implant stress, however, increased somewhat with implant length and bicortical anchorage.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>France</li>
</country>
<region><li>Île-de-France</li>
</region>
<settlement><li>Paris</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree><country name="France"><region name="Île-de-France"><name sortKey="Pierrisnard, Laurent" sort="Pierrisnard, Laurent" uniqKey="Pierrisnard L" first="Laurent" last="Pierrisnard">Laurent Pierrisnard</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Barquins, Michel" sort="Barquins, Michel" uniqKey="Barquins M" first="Michel" last="Barquins">Michel Barquins</name>
<name sortKey="Pierrisnard, Laurent" sort="Pierrisnard, Laurent" uniqKey="Pierrisnard L" first="Laurent" last="Pierrisnard">Laurent Pierrisnard</name>
<name sortKey="Renault, Patrick" sort="Renault, Patrick" uniqKey="Renault P" first="Patrick" last="Renault">Patrick Renault</name>
<name sortKey="Renouard, Franck" sort="Renouard, Franck" uniqKey="Renouard F" first="Franck" last="Renouard">Franck Renouard</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/France/Analysis
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000284 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/France/Analysis/biblio.hfd -nk 000284 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= France |étape= Analysis |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:74A6AF563AC2406B598B1B6C558CBD183EEA6284 |texte= Influence of Implant Length and Bicortical Anchorage on Implant Stress Distribution }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |